96 of every 100 cited passages support the proposed impact.
See what changes.
Find what it affects.
Trace reads your engineering documents, compares revisions, and flags the drawings and tests that may need to change. Every flag takes you to the source.
Get a demoStart where review hurts most
A changed line tells you what is different. Its connections tell you what to review next. Trace finds those connections and shows you why each one matters.
Find the answer. Open the source.
Ask about a requirement, component, or test. Trace brings back the relevant passage and the document it came from.
- Ask in plain language across requirements, components and tests
- Every answer links to the exact passage
- See which document and revision it came from
Spot the difference. Review the impact.
Compare two revisions. See which related documents may need an update, with the reason behind every flag.
- Line-level comparison between any two revisions
- Related documents flagged with the reason why
- Unchanged sections filtered out of the way
The revision is only half the story.
Trace links each requirement to the tests that verify it, so a change shows you which results may no longer hold.
- Follow a change through specifications and tests
- Link design requirements to verification results
- See which reviews are still open
Keep the decision. Carry the context.
Bring findings, source passages, and open questions into one review summary. Give the next reviewer a clear place to start.
- Findings and sources in one review summary
- Open questions carried to the next reviewer
- Decision history ready to share
Less searching.
More time resolving the change.
Evaluate Trace against your existing review process. Track the effort saved and the quality of the evidence.
Less time gathering context
Faster first-pass review
Speed from a new revision to a validated impact list.
Built for the reviews
you already run.
From a supplier datasheet to an audit request, Trace follows each change to the documents, tests, and decisions it touches.
Heard from
review teams.

“We need to know why something was flagged. Being able to open the exact passage would make the review much easier to trust.”

“When a requirement changed, we used to find the affected tests at the next audit. Now the out-of-date test shows up the same day.”

“Audit prep used to mean a week of digging through folders. Now we hand over the trail from requirement to sign-off, and every link opens the source.”

“Supplier datasheets change quietly. Trace caught a coating change that would have slipped past us and showed which work instruction it affected.”

“First-pass review on a new revision went from days to an afternoon. Our engineers still make the call, but they start from the right documents.”
Confidence comes from
being able to check.
The review should make its evidence, assumptions,
and limits easy to inspect.
Source before summary.
Read the passage behind the finding. Check its revision and decide whether it applies to the change.
Inference stays visible.
Distinguish an explicit document reference from a suggested connection that needs validation.
Approval stays human.
Engineers accept or dismiss findings. Your formal release process remains the authority.
Before you book
Does Trace approve changes?
No. Trace suggests what to review and shows why. Sign-off stays with your engineers and your existing release process.
How do I know why something was flagged?
Every finding links to the exact passage, document, and revision behind it, so you can check the reasoning yourself.
What documents does Trace read?
Specifications, requirements, drawings, test plans, and change notices: the records your reviews already depend on.
How do we evaluate it?
Bring one real revision. We measure time to a validated impact list and how often the cited passages support each finding.
Bring one revision.
See what it changes.
Pick a project and a document revision. We’ll show the impact, the sources, and whether Trace fits your review process.
Get a demo


